| Often the
primary DOE goal is to find the operating conditions that maximize (or
minimize) the system responses |
How do you
determine the optimal region to run a process?
The optimal region to run a process is usually determined after a sequence
of experiments is conducted and a series of empirical models are obtained.
In many engineering and science applications, experiments are conducted
and empirical models are developed with the objective of improving the
responses of interest. From a mathematical point of view, the objective
is to find the operating conditions (or factor levels) X1,
X2, ...,Xk that maximize or minimize the r
system response variables Y1, Y2, ...,Yr.
In experimental optimization, different optimization techniques are applied
to the fitted response equations .
Provided that the fitted equations approximate adequately the true (unknown)
system responses, the optimal operating conditions of the model will be
"close'' to the optimal operating conditions of the true system. |
The DOE approach to optimization
is to find approximate models and iteratively search for (near) optimal
operating conditions
Randomness (sampling variability) effects the final answers and should
be taken into account |
The experimental optimization of
response surface models differs from classical optimization techniques
in at least three ways:
-
Experimental optimization is an iterative process, that is, experiments
conducted in one set of experiments result in fitted models that indicate
where to search for improved operating conditions in the next set of experiments.
Thus the coefficients of the fitted equations (or the form of the fitted
equations) may change during the optimization process. This is in contrast
to classical optimization where the functions to optimize are supposed
to be fixed and given.
-
The response models are fitted from experimental data that usually contains
random variability due to uncontrollable or unknown causes. This implies
that an experiment, if repeated, will result in a different fitted response
surface model that might lead to different optimal operating conditions.
Therefore, sampling variability should be considered
in experimental optimization.
In contrast, in classical optimization techniques the functions
are deterministic and given.
-
The fitted responses are local approximations, implying that the optimization
process requires the input of the experimenter (a person familiar with
the process). This is in contrast with classical optimization which is
always automated in the form of some computer algorithm.
|